<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1485 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307183</link>
    <description>Section 271(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 is explained as permitting winding up where the company&#039;s formation or conduct is shown to be fraudulent or unlawful. The text states that the Tribunal may independently examine the underlying agreement and related transactions, even if they are described as private arrangements or are the subject of parallel proceedings. It further notes that limitation may run from discovery of the fraud, that estoppel does not bar a fraud plea, and that non-advertisement of the petition is not fatal where no prejudice is shown and the Tribunal dispenses with the requirement on the facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:41:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708592" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1485 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307183</link>
      <description>Section 271(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 is explained as permitting winding up where the company&#039;s formation or conduct is shown to be fraudulent or unlawful. The text states that the Tribunal may independently examine the underlying agreement and related transactions, even if they are described as private arrangements or are the subject of parallel proceedings. It further notes that limitation may run from discovery of the fraud, that estoppel does not bar a fraud plea, and that non-advertisement of the petition is not fatal where no prejudice is shown and the Tribunal dispenses with the requirement on the facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>