<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1059 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435673</link>
    <description>Regular bail in a GST evasion matter was declined because the investigation was still ongoing, the alleged offence was serious, and the accused could not claim parity with the co-accused. The court found that the accused&#039;s position was not identical to that of the co-accused who had earlier obtained bail, and that the earlier order had been influenced by considerations arising under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act that did not apply in the same way here.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2025 16:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1059 - PATIALA HOUSE COURTS</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435673</link>
      <description>Regular bail in a GST evasion matter was declined because the investigation was still ongoing, the alleged offence was serious, and the accused could not claim parity with the co-accused. The court found that the accused&#039;s position was not identical to that of the co-accused who had earlier obtained bail, and that the earlier order had been influenced by considerations arising under Section 6(2)(b) of the CGST Act that did not apply in the same way here.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435673</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>