<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1026 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435640</link>
    <description>Revisional proceedings under the repealed Haryana General Sales Tax Act could continue after the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 only where applications, appeals, revisions or other proceedings were pending when the new Act commenced. A completed assessment did not constitute a pending proceeding, so revisional action under the repealed regime lacked jurisdiction. The assessment for 2002-03 was also governed by the applicable post-VAT limitation framework and was time-barred because it was completed after the prescribed period. Collateral proceedings did not suspend limitation without a stay of the assessment. The adverse assessment and revisional orders were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:38:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1026 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435640</link>
      <description>Revisional proceedings under the repealed Haryana General Sales Tax Act could continue after the Haryana Value Added Tax Act, 2003 only where applications, appeals, revisions or other proceedings were pending when the new Act commenced. A completed assessment did not constitute a pending proceeding, so revisional action under the repealed regime lacked jurisdiction. The assessment for 2002-03 was also governed by the applicable post-VAT limitation framework and was time-barred because it was completed after the prescribed period. Collateral proceedings did not suspend limitation without a stay of the assessment. The adverse assessment and revisional orders were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>