<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Assessee&#039;s Internal CUP Method for Royalty Payments Upheld Over TPO&#039;s Different Activity Comparison.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68893</link>
    <description>TP Adjustment - benchmarking done by the assessee by adopting internal CUP - the comparable selected by the assessee is the correct comparable being payment of royalty for technology acquired for identical activity as availed by the assessee, while that of the TPO are for totally different activity - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:36:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:36:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Assessee&#039;s Internal CUP Method for Royalty Payments Upheld Over TPO&#039;s Different Activity Comparison.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68893</link>
      <description>TP Adjustment - benchmarking done by the assessee by adopting internal CUP - the comparable selected by the assessee is the correct comparable being payment of royalty for technology acquired for identical activity as availed by the assessee, while that of the TPO are for totally different activity - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:36:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68893</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>