<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 143 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32212</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s claims and upholding the decisions in both appeals. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between imparting education and providing commercial training or coaching services, highlighting the recognition of degrees by law and the absence of profit motives in the institutions&#039; activities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 16:55:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70854" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 143 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32212</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellants, rejecting the Revenue&#039;s claims and upholding the decisions in both appeals. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between imparting education and providing commercial training or coaching services, highlighting the recognition of degrees by law and the absence of profit motives in the institutions&#039; activities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 23 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>