<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1013 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435627</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for remand to the Adjudicating Authority, setting aside the previous orders that rejected the appellant&#039;s refund claim. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of considering protest payments in refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, highlighting the importance of documenting such protests for their impact on refund timelines.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:34:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1013 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435627</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for remand to the Adjudicating Authority, setting aside the previous orders that rejected the appellant&#039;s refund claim. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of considering protest payments in refund claims under Section 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, highlighting the importance of documenting such protests for their impact on refund timelines.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>