<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Revenue&#039;s Concerns on Party Relationship Examined; Section 4(4)(c) Test Required for Conclusion.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68891</link>
    <description>Valuation - related party transaction - The revenue’s concern in examining whether the parties were related might be justified; however, it could not have concluded that such relationship, as is contemplated by Section 4(4)(c) could have been inferred, without applying the proper test. - SC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:34:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:34:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Revenue&#039;s Concerns on Party Relationship Examined; Section 4(4)(c) Test Required for Conclusion.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68891</link>
      <description>Valuation - related party transaction - The revenue’s concern in examining whether the parties were related might be justified; however, it could not have concluded that such relationship, as is contemplated by Section 4(4)(c) could have been inferred, without applying the proper test. - SC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Mar 2023 09:34:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68891</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>