<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (12) TMI 45 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32210</link>
    <description>Doctrine of merger under the Central Excise Act applies only to the subject-matter actually brought before and decided by the superior forum on merits. Where an assessee&#039;s appeal concerns only one part of an order, the remaining part does not merge automatically, and the Revenue may pursue a separate challenge to the untouched portion. The absence of cross-objections does not enlarge the scope of the appeal so as to bar independent statutory action under Section 35E. The doctrine therefore did not prevent a departmental appeal directed on matters outside the assessee&#039;s earlier appeal, and merger was confined to the issues actually adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 17:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (12) TMI 45 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32210</link>
      <description>Doctrine of merger under the Central Excise Act applies only to the subject-matter actually brought before and decided by the superior forum on merits. Where an assessee&#039;s appeal concerns only one part of an order, the remaining part does not merge automatically, and the Revenue may pursue a separate challenge to the untouched portion. The absence of cross-objections does not enlarge the scope of the appeal so as to bar independent statutory action under Section 35E. The doctrine therefore did not prevent a departmental appeal directed on matters outside the assessee&#039;s earlier appeal, and merger was confined to the issues actually adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32210</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>