<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1628 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307170</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 by deleting an addition of Rs. 12,50,000 and sustaining Rs. 20,64,000. For Assessment Year 2007-08, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by deleting an addition of Rs. 28,49,960. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee is not obligated to prove the source of the source for advances received, in line with established legal principles.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 20:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1628 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307170</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal for Assessment Year 2006-07 by deleting an addition of Rs. 12,50,000 and sustaining Rs. 20,64,000. For Assessment Year 2007-08, the Tribunal allowed the appeal by deleting an addition of Rs. 28,49,960. The Tribunal emphasized that the assessee is not obligated to prove the source of the source for advances received, in line with established legal principles.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>