<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 1426 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307180</link>
    <description>Receipts from gifts, loans, partition share and bequest may be treated as part of a public servant&#039;s known sources of income in a disproportionate assets prosecution when they are lawful, contemporaneously disclosed in the manner required by the applicable rules, and supported by reliable records. The Court treated proper intimation and documentary proof, including reflection in income tax returns, as material in assessing whether the assets were explained. On the facts, the receipts were not shown to be bogus or part of a device, so they had to be deducted from the alleged excess and the conviction could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 20:40:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 1426 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307180</link>
      <description>Receipts from gifts, loans, partition share and bequest may be treated as part of a public servant&#039;s known sources of income in a disproportionate assets prosecution when they are lawful, contemporaneously disclosed in the manner required by the applicable rules, and supported by reliable records. The Court treated proper intimation and documentary proof, including reflection in income tax returns, as material in assessing whether the assets were explained. On the facts, the receipts were not shown to be bogus or part of a device, so they had to be deducted from the alleged excess and the conviction could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>