https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307162 A recall application against an order passed in revisional jurisdiction could not be treated as an intra-court appeal before a Division Bench, so the High Court erred in entertaining it on that basis. Under Order 32 Rule 15 CPC, a guardian may be appointed only after the court conducts the required inquiry and records a finding that the person is of unsound mind or is otherwise incapable of protecting her interests because of mental infirmity. In the absence of that inquiry, appointment of a guardian was impermissible, and the matter had to be remitted for fresh consideration after the mandated inquiry. en-us Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:20:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307162 A recall application against an order passed in revisional jurisdiction could not be treated as an intra-court appeal before a Division Bench, so the High Court erred in entertaining it on that basis. Under Order 32 Rule 15 CPC, a guardian may be appointed only after the court conducts the required inquiry and records a finding that the person is of unsound mind or is otherwise incapable of protecting her interests because of mental infirmity. In the absence of that inquiry, appointment of a guardian was impermissible, and the matter had to be remitted for fresh consideration after the mandated inquiry. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 05 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307162