<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1001 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435615</link>
    <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging registration cancellation. The court found the cancellation invalid under GST Act Section 29(2), noting the authorities improperly rejected the revocation application without valid grounds. The decision set aside the cancellation orders while permitting the department to continue proceedings under Section 74, ensuring procedural fairness for the registered proprietorship firm.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:41:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708467" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1001 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435615</link>
      <description>The HC allowed the writ petition challenging registration cancellation. The court found the cancellation invalid under GST Act Section 29(2), noting the authorities improperly rejected the revocation application without valid grounds. The decision set aside the cancellation orders while permitting the department to continue proceedings under Section 74, ensuring procedural fairness for the registered proprietorship firm.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435615</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>