<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 981 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435595</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, a Grade-A Officer with the Rajasthan State Government, by deleting the addition of Rs. 7,48,900/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the source of funds and marriage expenses, including cash withdrawals made before and after the marriage date. It noted that the lower authorities failed to consider all evidence and concluded that the addition was arbitrary and baseless.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708447" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 981 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435595</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee, a Grade-A Officer with the Rajasthan State Government, by deleting the addition of Rs. 7,48,900/- under Section 69C of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal found that the assessee adequately explained the source of funds and marriage expenses, including cash withdrawals made before and after the marriage date. It noted that the lower authorities failed to consider all evidence and concluded that the addition was arbitrary and baseless.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435595</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>