<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 73 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32200</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer to determine if the assessee had temporarily suspended its business and actually incurred claimed expenses, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of evidence before remitting cases for fresh determination. The Court concluded that there were sufficient materials available for both authorities to draw conclusions, leading to the tax case appeals being ordered accordingly with no costs imposed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 73 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32200</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the matter back to the Assessing Officer to determine if the assessee had temporarily suspended its business and actually incurred claimed expenses, emphasizing the need for a thorough examination of evidence before remitting cases for fresh determination. The Court concluded that there were sufficient materials available for both authorities to draw conclusions, leading to the tax case appeals being ordered accordingly with no costs imposed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>