https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435564 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for central excise duty against the company for the months of October 2011 to July 2012. Relying on previous cases challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the tribunal held that the demand for full cash payment was unsustainable. The penalties imposed on the company were also set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant. en-us Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Mar 2023 08:26:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435564 The tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for central excise duty against the company for the months of October 2011 to July 2012. Relying on previous cases challenging the constitutional validity of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the tribunal held that the demand for full cash payment was unsustainable. The penalties imposed on the company were also set aside, providing consequential relief to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 22 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435564