https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435552 A commercial dispute concerning payment claims under a work order was treated as arbitrable because prior proceedings before other fora did not negate the distinct scope of a Section 11 reference, and the court found no bar from forum shopping. The objection based on Section 21 notice also failed because the correspondence, reply, and surrounding proceedings clearly showed notice of the dispute and an intent to proceed with arbitration, with the respondent having engaged on that basis. The petition for appointment of an arbitrator was therefore maintainable, and interim protection was also granted pending arbitral adjudication. en-us Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2023 18:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435552 A commercial dispute concerning payment claims under a work order was treated as arbitrable because prior proceedings before other fora did not negate the distinct scope of a Section 11 reference, and the court found no bar from forum shopping. The objection based on Section 21 notice also failed because the correspondence, reply, and surrounding proceedings clearly showed notice of the dispute and an intent to proceed with arbitration, with the respondent having engaged on that basis. The petition for appointment of an arbitrator was therefore maintainable, and interim protection was also granted pending arbitral adjudication. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435552