<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 71 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32197</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner Income-tax(Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue. The judgment clarified the admissibility of interest on capital borrowed for preoperative expenses and the justification for interest rate differentiation between close relatives and other creditors under the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 71 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32197</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decisions of the Commissioner Income-tax(Appeals) and the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal filed by the revenue. The judgment clarified the admissibility of interest on capital borrowed for preoperative expenses and the justification for interest rate differentiation between close relatives and other creditors under the relevant sections of the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32197</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>