<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (8) TMI 140 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32195</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision to allow the deduction for bad debts written off by the assessee under section 36(1)(vii) for the assessment year 2001-02. The Court emphasized that the written-off amount should not be treated as capital in nature, as the appellant was in the business of money-lending. The Tribunal supported this decision, stating that the bad debt written off in the books of account was allowable as a deduction. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law for consideration.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70837" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (8) TMI 140 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32195</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision to allow the deduction for bad debts written off by the assessee under section 36(1)(vii) for the assessment year 2001-02. The Court emphasized that the written-off amount should not be treated as capital in nature, as the appellant was in the business of money-lending. The Tribunal supported this decision, stating that the bad debt written off in the books of account was allowable as a deduction. The Court dismissed the appeal, finding no substantial question of law for consideration.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32195</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>