https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435543 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the process issuance order against the petitioner for alleged offences under Sections 276B and 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the complaint, sanction order, and Commissioner's order sufficiently established the petitioner's liability as a Director Incharge, despite the petitioner's claim of non-involvement and residence in the Netherlands. The court found the allegations in the complaint adequate to proceed with prosecution, emphasizing that the petitioner's residence would be addressed during the trial. No costs were awarded. en-us Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Feb 2024 11:25:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435543 The HC dismissed the writ petition challenging the process issuance order against the petitioner for alleged offences under Sections 276B and 278B of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the complaint, sanction order, and Commissioner's order sufficiently established the petitioner's liability as a Director Incharge, despite the petitioner's claim of non-involvement and residence in the Netherlands. The court found the allegations in the complaint adequate to proceed with prosecution, emphasizing that the petitioner's residence would be addressed during the trial. No costs were awarded. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 13 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435543