https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435537 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 9,54,37,240/- made by the AO on account of bogus purchases/expenses for AY 2014-15. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided sufficient evidence during appellate proceedings, and the AO did not reject the books of accounts under section 145(3). The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)'s reasoning, noting the lack of doubt on sales and profit shown by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. en-us Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Mar 2023 08:41:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435537 The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding the CIT(A)'s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 9,54,37,240/- made by the AO on account of bogus purchases/expenses for AY 2014-15. The Tribunal found the assessee had provided sufficient evidence during appellate proceedings, and the AO did not reject the books of accounts under section 145(3). The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A)'s reasoning, noting the lack of doubt on sales and profit shown by the assessee, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue's appeal. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 21 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435537