<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 70 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32189</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that only the commission received by C &amp;amp; F agents for services rendered is liable for service tax, while amounts spent on behalf of the Principal and later reimbursed are not subject to tax. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and providing relief to the appellants. This judgment clarifies the tax liability of C &amp;amp; F agents, aligning with previous rulings and emphasizing the non-taxability of reimbursed expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 15:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70831" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 70 - CESTAT Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32189</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that only the commission received by C &amp;amp; F agents for services rendered is liable for service tax, while amounts spent on behalf of the Principal and later reimbursed are not subject to tax. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the lower authorities&#039; decision and providing relief to the appellants. This judgment clarifies the tax liability of C &amp;amp; F agents, aligning with previous rulings and emphasizing the non-taxability of reimbursed expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32189</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>