https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435506 The Court dismissed the intra-Court appeal by the Revenue, upholding the Hon'ble Single Judge's decision. The Revenue's appeal failed as the Court found no reason to interfere with the order, which directed the issuance of a discharge certificate to the assessee. The Court emphasized that the assessee had deposited an amount exceeding the required 50% of the disputed service tax demand under the SVLDR Scheme, 2019. Consequently, the Designated Committee's decision to deny further relief was upheld, reinforcing the importance of considering all amounts deposited when resolving tax disputes. en-us Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Oct 2023 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435506 The Court dismissed the intra-Court appeal by the Revenue, upholding the Hon'ble Single Judge's decision. The Revenue's appeal failed as the Court found no reason to interfere with the order, which directed the issuance of a discharge certificate to the assessee. The Court emphasized that the assessee had deposited an amount exceeding the required 50% of the disputed service tax demand under the SVLDR Scheme, 2019. Consequently, the Designated Committee's decision to deny further relief was upheld, reinforcing the importance of considering all amounts deposited when resolving tax disputes. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435506