https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435494 The High Court upheld the Appellate Court's decision to set aside the Respondent-Accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court's failure to adhere to procedural provisions regarding compensation and default sentences, coupled with the Respondent successfully rebutting the presumption of guilt, led to the conviction being overturned. The Respondent's denial of goods delivery in 2005, supported by bank evidence, effectively challenged the Appellant's case. The High Court found no reason to interfere, affirming the dismissal of the Appeal. en-us Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435494 The High Court upheld the Appellate Court's decision to set aside the Respondent-Accused's conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court's failure to adhere to procedural provisions regarding compensation and default sentences, coupled with the Respondent successfully rebutting the presumption of guilt, led to the conviction being overturned. The Respondent's denial of goods delivery in 2005, supported by bank evidence, effectively challenged the Appellant's case. The High Court found no reason to interfere, affirming the dismissal of the Appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435494