https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307141 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court held that the Respondent was not entitled to age relaxation based on a previous judgment, as it was a one-time relief specific to a particular recruitment process. The Recruitment Rules and age limits were upheld as valid, emphasizing the employer's prerogative in setting such criteria. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was found to be inapplicable in this case. en-us Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:19:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307141 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the judgments of the High Court and Central Administrative Tribunal. The Court held that the Respondent was not entitled to age relaxation based on a previous judgment, as it was a one-time relief specific to a particular recruitment process. The Recruitment Rules and age limits were upheld as valid, emphasizing the employer's prerogative in setting such criteria. The doctrine of legitimate expectation was found to be inapplicable in this case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307141