<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1625 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307139</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petition to set aside the arbitral award, with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000/-. The respondent was held to its affidavit limiting the execution of the award to the extent mentioned therein. The court did not rule on the correctness of the amounts, allowing the petitioner to challenge them if needed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:19:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1625 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307139</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petition to set aside the arbitral award, with costs assessed at Rs. 50,000/-. The respondent was held to its affidavit limiting the execution of the award to the extent mentioned therein. The court did not rule on the correctness of the amounts, allowing the petitioner to challenge them if needed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>