https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307137 Recovery of electricity dues against a company director was questioned on the footing that the supply agreement consumer was the company, not the director personally. The challenge also raised whether Clause 4.3(f)(v) of the Electricity Supply Code, 2005, which permits recovery from directors where the consumer is a company, is consistent with the Electricity Act, 2003 and the statutory definition of "consumer" under Section 2(15). Notice was issued and the matter was listed for further hearing; pending consideration, recovery against the petitioner-director was stayed, while enforcement against the company was left open in accordance with law. en-us Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:19:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307137 Recovery of electricity dues against a company director was questioned on the footing that the supply agreement consumer was the company, not the director personally. The challenge also raised whether Clause 4.3(f)(v) of the Electricity Supply Code, 2005, which permits recovery from directors where the consumer is a company, is consistent with the Electricity Act, 2003 and the statutory definition of "consumer" under Section 2(15). Notice was issued and the matter was listed for further hearing; pending consideration, recovery against the petitioner-director was stayed, while enforcement against the company was left open in accordance with law. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307137