<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1358 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307137</link>
    <description>The Court examined the validity of allowing recovery of electricity dues from a Director of a body corporate, which is the consumer, under Clause 4.3 (f) (v) of the Electricity Supply Code 2005. The issue centered on whether recovery from Directors of a corporate consumer is authorized under the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court stayed the enforcement against the Director, emphasizing the need for a detailed legal analysis and directing further submissions to determine the scope of recovery actions against individuals associated with corporate consumers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 20:19:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708272" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1358 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307137</link>
      <description>The Court examined the validity of allowing recovery of electricity dues from a Director of a body corporate, which is the consumer, under Clause 4.3 (f) (v) of the Electricity Supply Code 2005. The issue centered on whether recovery from Directors of a corporate consumer is authorized under the Electricity Act, 2003. The Court stayed the enforcement against the Director, emphasizing the need for a detailed legal analysis and directing further submissions to determine the scope of recovery actions against individuals associated with corporate consumers.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307137</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>