<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1484 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307143</link>
    <description>The court determined that the current suit was not barred by res judicata. It found that the first suit did not conclusively determine the property&#039;s title, the second suit&#039;s compromise decree did not address the title, and the third suit did not adjudicate the title. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the trial court for a full trial, with instructions to resolve the suit within one year.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Dec 2024 15:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708266" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1484 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307143</link>
      <description>The court determined that the current suit was not barred by res judicata. It found that the first suit did not conclusively determine the property&#039;s title, the second suit&#039;s compromise decree did not address the title, and the third suit did not adjudicate the title. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the case was remanded to the trial court for a full trial, with instructions to resolve the suit within one year.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307143</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>