https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307126 The High Court upheld the legality of the judgments and conviction orders of the trial court and Sessions Court, finding no procedural errors. It confirmed the debt owed by the petitioner to the second respondent, supported by statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The validity of the cheques issued by the petitioner was upheld, as the presumption favored the second respondent. The court deemed the statutory notice served to the petitioner valid, relying on postal acknowledgments. Procedural compliance with Section 138 of the Act was affirmed, leading to the dismissal of the revision application and confirmation of the petitioner's guilt under the Act. en-us Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:47:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307126 The High Court upheld the legality of the judgments and conviction orders of the trial court and Sessions Court, finding no procedural errors. It confirmed the debt owed by the petitioner to the second respondent, supported by statutory presumption under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The validity of the cheques issued by the petitioner was upheld, as the presumption favored the second respondent. The court deemed the statutory notice served to the petitioner valid, relying on postal acknowledgments. Procedural compliance with Section 138 of the Act was affirmed, leading to the dismissal of the revision application and confirmation of the petitioner's guilt under the Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Sat, 01 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307126