https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307125 A claimed hereditary right to the office of Mutawalli was not established because the materials did not prove a custom of hereditary succession, and the pre-cession farmans and sanads did not survive transfer of sovereignty without recognition by the new sovereign. The earlier litigation did not bar the claim, since hereditary title was only incidentally considered and the interested body was not shown to have been a party or privy. The later statute also did not recognise or preserve any hereditary family right to appointment, as its administrative scheme did not confer such a statutory entitlement. en-us Mon, 29 Jul 1946 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:28:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307125 A claimed hereditary right to the office of Mutawalli was not established because the materials did not prove a custom of hereditary succession, and the pre-cession farmans and sanads did not survive transfer of sovereignty without recognition by the new sovereign. The earlier litigation did not bar the claim, since hereditary title was only incidentally considered and the interested body was not shown to have been a party or privy. The later statute also did not recognise or preserve any hereditary family right to appointment, as its administrative scheme did not confer such a statutory entitlement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 29 Jul 1946 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307125