https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32183 The judgment addressed the Revenue's repeated adjournment requests in cases involving M/s. Apollo Tyres Limited, M/s. MRF Ltd., and J.K. Industries Ltd., causing hardship to the appellants who were ready for hearings. The Tribunal expressed concern over the Revenue's lack of serious engagement in pursuing appeals, directing officials to ensure support for efficient proceedings. Regarding the excisability of an intermediate product, the Tribunal granted the appellant's request for remand to establish the non-marketability of the product. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair and timely hearings without unnecessary delays. en-us Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 03 Apr 2013 10:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32183 The judgment addressed the Revenue's repeated adjournment requests in cases involving M/s. Apollo Tyres Limited, M/s. MRF Ltd., and J.K. Industries Ltd., causing hardship to the appellants who were ready for hearings. The Tribunal expressed concern over the Revenue's lack of serious engagement in pursuing appeals, directing officials to ensure support for efficient proceedings. Regarding the excisability of an intermediate product, the Tribunal granted the appellant's request for remand to establish the non-marketability of the product. The judgment emphasized the importance of fair and timely hearings without unnecessary delays. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 04 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32183