<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (7) TMI 712 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307124</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the premature arbitration request for failing to comply with the contractual dispute resolution process. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to the agreed-upon steps outlined in the agreement before seeking arbitration. The applicant was permitted to enforce the arbitration clause after fulfilling the prerequisites specified in the contract, underscoring the importance of following the prescribed procedure for dispute resolution.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:52:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708247" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (7) TMI 712 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307124</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the premature arbitration request for failing to comply with the contractual dispute resolution process. It emphasized the necessity of adhering to the agreed-upon steps outlined in the agreement before seeking arbitration. The applicant was permitted to enforce the arbitration clause after fulfilling the prerequisites specified in the contract, underscoring the importance of following the prescribed procedure for dispute resolution.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307124</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>