<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Orders Reassessment: Insufficient Response Time to Show Cause Notice; Fairness in Tax Assessments Highlighted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68841</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment orders - non providing time seekeed to reply to SCN - Since the documents have already been given by the petitioner to the respondent during the pendency of these writ petitions, no prejudice would be caused if the assessments are redone in respect of the assessment years - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:20:44 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:20:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Orders Reassessment: Insufficient Response Time to Show Cause Notice; Fairness in Tax Assessments Highlighted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68841</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment orders - non providing time seekeed to reply to SCN - Since the documents have already been given by the petitioner to the respondent during the pendency of these writ petitions, no prejudice would be caused if the assessments are redone in respect of the assessment years - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 09:20:44 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=68841</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>