https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32179 Repeated adjournments sought by the Department were disapproved, as the Tribunal noted that earlier adjournments had already been taken on the ground of engaging special counsel. The request was nevertheless accepted only as a final chance, with directions that the matter be listed for regular hearing on the next date and decided on merits if the Department again failed to appear. Pending further hearing, the Tribunal also restrained coercive recovery against the appellants, taking account of the substantial revenue stake and the earlier complete waiver of pre-deposit. en-us Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32179 Repeated adjournments sought by the Department were disapproved, as the Tribunal noted that earlier adjournments had already been taken on the ground of engaging special counsel. The request was nevertheless accepted only as a final chance, with directions that the matter be listed for regular hearing on the next date and decided on merits if the Department again failed to appear. Pending further hearing, the Tribunal also restrained coercive recovery against the appellants, taking account of the substantial revenue stake and the earlier complete waiver of pre-deposit. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 30 Nov 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32179