<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435469</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to disallow Rs. 16,99,358 under Section 36(va) for delayed deposit of employees&#039; contributions towards PF and ESI, citing precedents that deductions are only allowed if deposits are made before due dates. The Tribunal found the disallowance justified based on audit reports showing delayed payments. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 22:36:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708204" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 855 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435469</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s decision to disallow Rs. 16,99,358 under Section 36(va) for delayed deposit of employees&#039; contributions towards PF and ESI, citing precedents that deductions are only allowed if deposits are made before due dates. The Tribunal found the disallowance justified based on audit reports showing delayed payments. The appeal was dismissed, affirming the lower authorities&#039; orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>