https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32178 The tribunal rejected the application for review seeking rectification of a mistake in a stay order, emphasizing that subsequent orders by a co-ordinate bench could not be grounds for review. The applicant was directed to seek remedy through a writ petition in the High Court. An extension of two weeks was granted for compliance with the original order, with a deposit deadline set for 14-8-2008. The tribunal clarified procedural steps to be followed post judgment. en-us Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:00:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32178 The tribunal rejected the application for review seeking rectification of a mistake in a stay order, emphasizing that subsequent orders by a co-ordinate bench could not be grounds for review. The applicant was directed to seek remedy through a writ petition in the High Court. An extension of two weeks was granted for compliance with the original order, with a deposit deadline set for 14-8-2008. The tribunal clarified procedural steps to be followed post judgment. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 01 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32178