https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435462 A fourth bail application was rejected because no material change in circumstances was shown after earlier merits-based refusals. Parity with a co-accused was not accepted, as the applicant's role was found to be different from that of the co-accused who had been granted bail. The medical ground also failed because jail records showed ongoing treatment, further care was available in a government hospital, and the applicant had declined surgery when offered. On these findings, the Court held that the applicant was not entitled to bail. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435462 A fourth bail application was rejected because no material change in circumstances was shown after earlier merits-based refusals. Parity with a co-accused was not accepted, as the applicant's role was found to be different from that of the co-accused who had been granted bail. The medical ground also failed because jail records showed ongoing treatment, further care was available in a government hospital, and the applicant had declined surgery when offered. On these findings, the Court held that the applicant was not entitled to bail. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435462