<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 828 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435442</link>
    <description>A sanctioned rehabilitation scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 binds all creditors, including unsecured creditors, because Section 18 authorises collective financial reconstruction and Section 18(8) makes the scheme binding on the sick company, shareholders, creditors, guarantors and employees. An unsecured creditor cannot treat the scheme as optional or wait to recover the full debt after revival, as that would undermine the statutory restructuring process and the revival of the sick company. Section 32 gives the scheme overriding effect, and the reduction of dues under the scheme is by authority of law, so the Article 300A objection fails. The creditor must accept the scaled down value of its dues.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 10:50:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 828 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435442</link>
      <description>A sanctioned rehabilitation scheme under the Sick Industrial Companies (Special Provisions) Act, 1985 binds all creditors, including unsecured creditors, because Section 18 authorises collective financial reconstruction and Section 18(8) makes the scheme binding on the sick company, shareholders, creditors, guarantors and employees. An unsecured creditor cannot treat the scheme as optional or wait to recover the full debt after revival, as that would undermine the statutory restructuring process and the revival of the sick company. Section 32 gives the scheme overriding effect, and the reduction of dues under the scheme is by authority of law, so the Article 300A objection fails. The creditor must accept the scaled down value of its dues.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435442</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>