https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307117 The court found Ext. P2 invalid as it exceeded the scope of Section 11(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. However, Ext. P3, issued in compliance with Ext. P2, was deemed valid as the Corporation acted under the Central Government's policy directions. Despite non-compliance with Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, Exts. P2 and P3 were retrospectively validated by the Life Insurance Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1 of 1981. Consequently, the court dismissed the Original Petition based on the retrospective validation of Exts. P2 and P3. en-us Mon, 27 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:08:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307117 The court found Ext. P2 invalid as it exceeded the scope of Section 11(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act, 1956. However, Ext. P3, issued in compliance with Ext. P2, was deemed valid as the Corporation acted under the Central Government's policy directions. Despite non-compliance with Section 9A of the Industrial Disputes Act, Exts. P2 and P3 were retrospectively validated by the Life Insurance Corporation (Amendment) Act, 1 of 1981. Consequently, the court dismissed the Original Petition based on the retrospective validation of Exts. P2 and P3. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307117