https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307117 Section 11(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act was confined to alterations for transferred employees during transfer, integration and standardisation, so Ext. P2 exceeded that power when it revised service conditions later for Development Officers. Ext. P3, though issued alongside Ext. P2, was not invalid merely because it followed the Government's direction. The changes affected wages, increments, appraisal and allowances in matters covered by the Fourth Schedule, so Section 9A notice was required and its absence rendered the orders invalid when made; however, the Kerala HC held that Act 1 of 1981 retrospectively validated the measures by supplying the missing statutory basis, curing the defect and sustaining their legal efficacy. en-us Mon, 27 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 20 Mar 2023 15:08:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307117 Section 11(2) of the Life Insurance Corporation Act was confined to alterations for transferred employees during transfer, integration and standardisation, so Ext. P2 exceeded that power when it revised service conditions later for Development Officers. Ext. P3, though issued alongside Ext. P2, was not invalid merely because it followed the Government's direction. The changes affected wages, increments, appraisal and allowances in matters covered by the Fourth Schedule, so Section 9A notice was required and its absence rendered the orders invalid when made; however, the Kerala HC held that Act 1 of 1981 retrospectively validated the measures by supplying the missing statutory basis, curing the defect and sustaining their legal efficacy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 27 May 1985 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=307117