<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 807 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435421</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found that the relationship between OMIFCO, KRIBHCO, and the Government of India did not influence the import price. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowed the appeal, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to impose a redemption fine. Charges of misdeclaration and undervaluation were deemed unsustainable, and the differential duty demand, interest, and penalties were set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2023 08:33:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708096" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 807 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435421</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found that the relationship between OMIFCO, KRIBHCO, and the Government of India did not influence the import price. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders, allowed the appeal, and dismissed the revenue&#039;s appeal seeking to impose a redemption fine. Charges of misdeclaration and undervaluation were deemed unsustainable, and the differential duty demand, interest, and penalties were set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>