<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 806 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435420</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside allegations of violations under various regulations of the Courier Import and Export Regulations, 2010, finding no deliberate withholding of information or failure on the part of the Appellant. The order of forfeiture of the security deposit was overturned, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 20,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 806 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435420</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside allegations of violations under various regulations of the Courier Import and Export Regulations, 2010, finding no deliberate withholding of information or failure on the part of the Appellant. The order of forfeiture of the security deposit was overturned, and the penalty was reduced to Rs. 20,000.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435420</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>