<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 805 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Petitioner/Appellant&#039;s application seeking leave to file an appeal against the Impugned Order, stating it was intended to disrupt the liquidation process. The main case was rejected, and connected pending applications were closed. The Tribunal found that the Petitioner, not being a stakeholder in the liquidation process, lacked a vested interest in the Corporate Debtor, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Mar 2023 22:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708092" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 805 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Petitioner/Appellant&#039;s application seeking leave to file an appeal against the Impugned Order, stating it was intended to disrupt the liquidation process. The main case was rejected, and connected pending applications were closed. The Tribunal found that the Petitioner, not being a stakeholder in the liquidation process, lacked a vested interest in the Corporate Debtor, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>