https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435410 HC held that assessment notices in Form E-24 were not in conformity with statutory requirements and cannot be sustained; petitioners must determine their liability from their self-assessed returns rather than be remitted for fresh scrutiny after long delay. While interest under Section 7(5) is not payable where sufficient cause exists and the 1/3 deposit was treated as such, because petitioners ultimately failed before the Supreme Court the HC directed payment of interest as compensatory relief for the withheld 2/3rds from 2010 to 28.03.2017 and issued a writ of mandamus to that effect, disposing the petitions. en-us Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 14 Nov 2025 10:15:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435410 HC held that assessment notices in Form E-24 were not in conformity with statutory requirements and cannot be sustained; petitioners must determine their liability from their self-assessed returns rather than be remitted for fresh scrutiny after long delay. While interest under Section 7(5) is not payable where sufficient cause exists and the 1/3 deposit was treated as such, because petitioners ultimately failed before the Supreme Court the HC directed payment of interest as compensatory relief for the withheld 2/3rds from 2010 to 28.03.2017 and issued a writ of mandamus to that effect, disposing the petitions. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435410