<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (6) TMI 163 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32162</link>
    <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the levy of service tax on the appellants for providing cargo handling services to Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. The Authority found that the appellants&#039; activities, including loading coal into railway wagons using pay loaders, constituted cargo handling agency services. The penalties imposed were sustained, except for one instance where the penalty was waived due to confusion during the law&#039;s early implementation. The appellants were required to pay the service tax with interest, but some penalties were waived. The orders were confirmed, emphasizing that the appellants&#039; activities fell within the scope of &quot;cargo handling service&quot; under the Finance Act &#039;94.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=70804" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (6) TMI 163 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32162</link>
      <description>The Appellate Authority upheld the levy of service tax on the appellants for providing cargo handling services to Mahanadi Coalfields Ltd. The Authority found that the appellants&#039; activities, including loading coal into railway wagons using pay loaders, constituted cargo handling agency services. The penalties imposed were sustained, except for one instance where the penalty was waived due to confusion during the law&#039;s early implementation. The appellants were required to pay the service tax with interest, but some penalties were waived. The orders were confirmed, emphasizing that the appellants&#039; activities fell within the scope of &quot;cargo handling service&quot; under the Finance Act &#039;94.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=32162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>