<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 774 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435388</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,65,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) accepted the genuineness of the transactions involving share capital raised from investor companies, supported by documentary evidence. The Tribunal affirmed that the investor companies demonstrated creditworthiness and compliance with legal requirements, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:30:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 774 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435388</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,65,00,000 under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(A) accepted the genuineness of the transactions involving share capital raised from investor companies, supported by documentary evidence. The Tribunal affirmed that the investor companies demonstrated creditworthiness and compliance with legal requirements, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>