<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 773 - ITAT SURAT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435387</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the quantum assessment issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, allowing additional evidence to be verified. The penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) was set aside, with the Assessing Officer granted the discretion to issue a new penalty order if required. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:30:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=708009" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 773 - ITAT SURAT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435387</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the quantum assessment issue to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration, allowing additional evidence to be verified. The penalty order under Section 271(1)(c) was set aside, with the Assessing Officer granted the discretion to issue a new penalty order if required. Both appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>