<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 759 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435373</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment and the computation of capital gains by the Assessing Officer. However, it directed the AO to refer the matter to the Valuation Officer for determining the fair market value of the property. The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:29:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707995" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 759 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435373</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the reopening of the assessment and the computation of capital gains by the Assessing Officer. However, it directed the AO to refer the matter to the Valuation Officer for determining the fair market value of the property. The appeal filed by the assessee was partly allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>