<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 754 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435368</link>
    <description>Tubular towers imported for use in wind operated electricity generators were treated as integral components of the generator and therefore eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. The analysis accepted that the tower supports the nacelle and rotor assembly, making it a part of the wind operated electricity generator rather than a separate item. A tariff classification distinction was found insufficient to defeat exemption where the notification covered the generator and its components and parts. On that basis, the denial of exemption and the associated differential duty demand were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:29:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707990" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 754 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435368</link>
      <description>Tubular towers imported for use in wind operated electricity generators were treated as integral components of the generator and therefore eligible for exemption under Notification No. 6/2006-C.E. The analysis accepted that the tower supports the nacelle and rotor assembly, making it a part of the wind operated electricity generator rather than a separate item. A tariff classification distinction was found insufficient to defeat exemption where the notification covered the generator and its components and parts. On that basis, the denial of exemption and the associated differential duty demand were set aside in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435368</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>