<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 749 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435363</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Company Appeal (AT) No. 29 of 2022, setting aside the NCLT&#039;s order dated 17.01.2022. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh hearing on C.P. No. 100 of 2018 and the withdrawal of withdrawal pursis, stating that issuing an interim order during a pending appeal was inappropriate. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 16:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 749 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , PRINCIPAL BENCH , NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435363</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal allowed the Company Appeal (AT) No. 29 of 2022, setting aside the NCLT&#039;s order dated 17.01.2022. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a fresh hearing on C.P. No. 100 of 2018 and the withdrawal of withdrawal pursis, stating that issuing an interim order during a pending appeal was inappropriate. No costs were awarded in the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435363</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>