<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 746 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435360</link>
    <description>The proviso to section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is construed as a narrow bail relaxation for a person who is truly sick or infirm, meaning a condition of grave, persistent severity that is life-endangering or cannot be adequately managed in prison medical facilities. Mere illness, age, or custodial treatment is insufficient. On the medical record discussed, stability and jail-hospital care did not establish sickness, but recurring seizures, behavioural disorder, worsening condition, and the need for an attendant for timely medication supported infirmity within the proviso. Once that threshold was met, the twin conditions under section 45(1) did not apply, though ordinary bail factors remained relevant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:28:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 746 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435360</link>
      <description>The proviso to section 45(1) of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act is construed as a narrow bail relaxation for a person who is truly sick or infirm, meaning a condition of grave, persistent severity that is life-endangering or cannot be adequately managed in prison medical facilities. Mere illness, age, or custodial treatment is insufficient. On the medical record discussed, stability and jail-hospital care did not establish sickness, but recurring seizures, behavioural disorder, worsening condition, and the need for an attendant for timely medication supported infirmity within the proviso. Once that threshold was met, the twin conditions under section 45(1) did not apply, though ordinary bail factors remained relevant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435360</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>