<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 742 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435356</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition seeking permission to benefit from the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019 due to failure to deposit the required amount within the specified time, despite alleging technical glitches. The court referenced a judgment by the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of a related Special Leave Petition, affirming the deadline requirements. Despite an extension, the petitioner did not deposit the amount even within the extended period, with the court finding no evidence of attempts to comply. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, declining to intervene based on the lack of justification.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 Mar 2023 08:28:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=707974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 742 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435356</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition seeking permission to benefit from the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, 2019 due to failure to deposit the required amount within the specified time, despite alleging technical glitches. The court referenced a judgment by the Allahabad High Court and the Supreme Court&#039;s dismissal of a related Special Leave Petition, affirming the deadline requirements. Despite an extension, the petitioner did not deposit the amount even within the extended period, with the court finding no evidence of attempts to comply. Consequently, the court dismissed the petition, declining to intervene based on the lack of justification.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=435356</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>